8 Marketing Beliefs That Are Hurting Brands

What could possibly be leading marketers astray today? Here are eight beliefs that are hurting brands.

1. Millennials Are Real

Marketers are obsessed with millennials. Ask almost any brand what demographic they are targeting and they will say it is those aged between 18 and 33. In my analysis of articles appearing in the trade marketing press, the ratio of articles about millennials versus other demographics was 42:1.

Yet is this really sensible? I estimate that millennials account for less than 10% of the population and an even lower proportion of disposable income. I question if whether this one homogenous group that includes everyone across a 15-year age gap even really exists.

My conclusion? The answer to every question [in marketing] is millennials. It’s lazy marketing. Millennials don’t exist. They do as a group of people but the idea that they are different from Baby Boomers is just not true. Millennials just help us to confirm our absolute obsession with youth. That’s the real power of it. That marketing is only really interested in young customers.

2. TV Advertising Is Dead

Don’t believe the myths around the death of television advertising at the hands of digital. The proof begins to emerge with BARB data from the UK which shows that UK adults watch 4 hours and 30 minutes of video content per day, 82% of it on TV.

Among millennials that figure does drop, but only to 70%. Marketers have a self-induced belief that digital is changing the world and somehow traditional is being destroyed. It is way off base.

In the US consumers spend more time with TV than all the other media, including phones and PCs, combined.

The same is true of TV advertising. According to the latest forecasts from the Advertising Association and Warc, TV ad budgets in the UK were up by more than 7% in 2015 and will grow by 5% both this year and next.

People are still watching TV. Is it going to last forever? Probably not. But right now it’s not only not dying its super dominant.

3. Corporate Social Responsibility Is Meaningful

Corporate social responsibility might be a well established concept to some but I’m not so sure. Look at the Reputation Institute’s global analysis of reputable companies, which in 2015 named Google as the most reputable company globally despite it paying just £20m in taxes in the UK in 2013 on revenues of £3bn.

What Google has done while not illegal questions the morality of its tax avoidance. Being reputable is not just about not doing illegal things, it’s about doing what is right.

CSR also seems to have little impact on business performance. Volkswagen, which built its brand around offering more environmentally friendly cars, is currently engulfed in a huge scandal for rigging emissions tests on its diesel engines. Yet sales across Europe are still growing.

If companies like Volkswagen with giant CSR strategies are doing this you know from a corporate point of view its pointless. But if customers don’t care either and are still buying Volkswagen cars despite this behavior we can conclude that CSR doesn’t matter on either side.

4. Targeting Is Unnecessary

Targeting has been criticized of late, with Mars CMO Bruce McColl recently saying that he isn’t a great believer in it because Mars’ target audience is the “7 billion people sitting on the planet”.

I disagree. While in some markets it might make sense for most brands it is a crucial step in part because they have limited resources and so need to reach those most likely to make a purchase but also because targeting allows more differentiated messaging.

If you target everyone the only thing you can talk about is the product. Brutal brand awareness or product features. When we segment we’re able to target different segments and give them different messages based on very different needs.

The reason a lot of brands have the ‘usual suspects’ in their positioning is because they target everyone. They have to use ‘innovation’, ‘integrity’, ‘trust’, ‘quality’, ‘value’ because who could ever have a problem with any of those things? When we segment we get tighter, we can do better positioning and in my experience we can make more money.

5. Brand Valuation Is Useful

My opinion of brand valuation is very low. Look at Apple, which Interbrand values at $170bn, Millward Brown’s BrandZ at $240bn and Brand Finance at $128bn. If the world’s biggest valuation firms can’t agree within $100bn what a brand is worth it tells you that brand valuation is pointless.

6. Zero Based Budgeting Is A Mistake

Brands including Unilever, Mondelez and Coca-Cola have all adopted zero-based budgeting for their marketing departments in recent months. While some have put it down as a cost-cutting exercise, I call it a superior approach that enables marketers to prove ROI and position their department as an investment, rather than a cost.

Just because it has zero in it doesn’t mean it’s bad. We are going to start from zero and then marketers are going to have to do their job to get any money. Research, segment, target, position, set objectives with a benchmark and a goal, as a result can calculate the dollar value, annualize that value and get a dollar value. That is not easy but marketing isn’t meant to be easy.

Yet 95% of marketers have their budgets set by finance departments that base it on last year’s sales, the expected growth rate and by applying  a totally random sales to advertising ratio. There is so much wrong with that. The minute you let your budgets be created like this marketing becomes a cost.

7. Brand Purpose Takes Brands Higher

Brands use the ‘benefit ladder’ in their marketing, aiming to get move from promoting product features to product benefits, functional benefits and then emotional benefits. As marketers we want to try and get as high up the ladder as we can. The higher we can go the more we can charge and the more successful we will be.

When we get to brand purpose we go too high, we reach too far. We’ve jumped off the benefit ladder. The issue is that marketers become so busy inspiring people with their brand purpose that they lose sight of their products. Yet a lot of the next generation of marketers doesn’t want to sell burgers or cornflakes, they want to inspire.

Most marketers don’t want to be marketers any more. They are ashamed to sell. If you are a Coke marketer would you rather sell sugar water or inspire happiness?

8. Digital Marketing Is Superior

The word, the concept, of digital is over. Everything is digital. It doesn’t mean anything anymore. The problem is that digital is a silo that limits marketers’ thinking. But the even bigger problem is that it is a tactic, not a strategy, and marketers have become preoccupied with it.

You can’t be a good marketer if you’ve started with a tool before diagnosing the problem. Put the tools down and come back to strategy. Find out what you need to do in a media neutral way. Start with the customer and the strategy and then choose the tools.

Facebook, Instagram, radio and TV; they are all tactics. They are a part of marketing but they are the not the big part. The big part is upstairs – strategy. But the conversation in marketing are no longer about strategy they’re about tools.

This thought piece is featured courtesy of Marketing Week, the United Kingdom’s leading marketing publication.

The Blake Project Can Help: Accelerate Brand Growth Through Powerful Emotional Connections

Branding Strategy Insider is a service of The Blake Project: A strategic brand consultancy specializing in Brand Research, Brand Strategy, Brand Licensing and Brand Education

FREE Publications And Resources For Marketers

from Branding Strategy Insider http://ift.tt/1QX0ptF
via IFTTT